Part 21 Report - 1997-412
ACCESSION #: 9706250258
OPPD
Omaha Public Power District
444 South 16th Street Mall
Omaha NE 68102-2247
June 17, 1997
LIC-97-094
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Attn: Document Control Desk
Mail Station P1-137
Washington, DC 20555
Reference: Docket No. 50-285
SUBJECT: 10 CFR 21 Report on Nonconforming Raw Water Pump Impellers
Pursuant to 10 CFR 21 (d)(3)(ii), Omaha Public Power District (OPPD)
provides the attached written notification of a defect in a basic
component (Raw Water pump impellers) at Fort Calhoun Station Unit No. 1.
Initial notification of this condition was made to the OPPD responsible
corporate officer and to the NRC Operations Center on May 23, 1997.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
S. K. Gambhir
Division Manager
Engineering & Operations Support
TCM/tcm
Attachment
c: Winston & Strawn
E. W. Merschoff, NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV
L. R. Wharton, NRC Project Manager
W. C. Walker, NRC Senior Resident Inspector
45.5124 Employment with Equal Opportunity
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
LIC-97-094
Attachment
Page 1
Omaha Public Power District (OPPD)
Report on Nonconforming Raw Water Pump Impellers
This report is submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 21.21(d)(3)(ii). The items
below address the specific information required by 10 CFR 21.21.(d)(4).
(i) Identification of individual providing this notification:
S. K. Gambhir
Division Manager - Engineering & Operations Support
Omaha Public Power District
Fort Calhoun Station
P. O. Box 399
Fort Calhoun, NE 68023-0399
(ii) Basic components containing defect:
Replacement impellers for Byron Jackson Raw Water pumps had
blade dimensions out of tolerance. Pumps are Model 28RXL 2-
stage VCT.
(iii) Identification of supplier:
BW/IP International, Inc.
(iv) Nature of Defect:
Raw Water pump assembly AC-10D was replaced due to normal wear
On the pump internals, namely the pump impellers and impeller
liners. The replacement assembly had been rebuilt with new
internal components. After installation, post maintenance and
operability testing was performed using a station procedure.
The pump did not satisfy the acceptance criteria contained in
the test; therefore, the pump remained inoperable. The fact
that the pump did not pass the test was very unusual especially
considering the pump was completely rebuilt with all new
internal subcomponents. The impeller lift setting was
reverified and then the post maintenance/ operability test was
again performed. Again the pump did not pass the test, so the
pump assembly was removed and replaced with a another spare
pump assembly.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
LIC-97-094
Attachment
Page 2
The "defective" pump assembly was then disassembled for
inspection to determine the cause of the extremely poor
performance. Upon inspection of the first stage pump impeller,
it was noticed that the blade profile was significantly
different when compared to the second stage impeller. At least
two of the four blades on the first stage impeller appeared to
have a "droop" causing the opening or suction eye between the
blades to decrease. The size of the suction eye for these
particular type of pumps has a large influence on the amount of
discharge flow the pump is able to produce. This is because
the decreased suction eye size causes the impeller to become
extremely inefficient. With the defective impeller installed
in the first stage of the pump, discharge flow was drastically
affected.
One other replacement impeller in the warehouse was determined
to have similar deficiencies.
Potential Safety Significance
The subject impellers contained dimensional inaccuracies which
prevented pump discharge flows from satisfying the acceptance
criteria. The estimated reduction of design flow was 20%. The
Plant Review Committee conservatively determined that operation
of a Raw Water pump AC-10D at the maximum allowable river
temperature (90 degrees F) with the defective impeller
installed could have created a substantial safety hazard by
exceeding a safety limit or causing a major degradation of
essential safety-related equipment, considering a single
failure in addition to the degraded performance of AC-10D. The
river water temperature at the time of discovery was 36 degrees
F.
(v) Date information of defect was obtained:
The installation of the replacement pump assembly with the
defective impeller and unsuccessful testing was initially
identified on April 8, 1997. Based on review of an engineering
evaluation of this condition, OPPD management on May 22, 1997
conservatively determined that a defect existed. The OPPD Vice
President with executive authority over Part 21 issues was
informed on May 23, 1997.
(vi) Number and Location of components containing defect:
Two defective impellers passed the OPPD receipt inspection and
were stocked in the warehouse. Because dimensional information
is considered proprietary by BW/IP International, the receipt
inspection relied on verification of the part number and the
fact that BW/IP International is an Appendix B supplier. One
of these impellers was used to rebuild a spare pump assembly
which was
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
LIC-97-094
Attachment
Page 3
installed as Raw Water pump AC-10D. The supplier has not
reported these impeller defects. The existence of other
similarly defective impellers from this supplier is unknown to
OPPD.
(vii) Corrective action which has, or is being taken:
The defective impellers are being returned to the supplier.
Raw Water pump AC-10D was replaced with a rebuilt pump assembly
which passed all post-maintenance Surveillance test
requirements. The supplier has been notified about this
report.
(viii) Advice related to defect to be given to licensees:
None.
*** END OF DOCUMENT ***
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021