Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant - Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 14)

On this page:

• Publication Information
• Abstract

Download complete document

• NUREG-1437, Supplement 14 (PDF - 21.0 MB)

Publication Information

Manuscript Completed: December 2003
Date Published: January 2004

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) considered the environmental impacts of renewing nuclear power plant operating licenses (OLs) for a 20-year period in its Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (GEIS), NUREG-1437, Volumes 1 and 2, and codified the results in 10 CFR Part 51. The GEIS (and its Addendum 1) identifies 92 environmental issues and reaches generic conclusions related to environmental impacts for 69 of these issues that apply to all plants or to plants with specific design or site characteristics. Additional plant-specific review is required for the remaining 23 issues. These plant-specific reviews are to be included in a supplement to the GEIS.

an application submitted to the NRC by the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E) to renew the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna) OL for an additional 20 years under 10 CFR Part 54. This SEIS includes the NRC staff's analysis that considers and weighs the environmental impacts of the proposed action, the environmental impacts of alternatives to the proposed action, and mitigation measures available for reducing or avoiding adverse impacts. It also includes the staff's recommendation regarding the proposed action. Regarding the 69 issues for which the GEIS reached generic conclusions, neither RG&E nor NRC staff identified information that is both new and significant for any of these issues that apply to Ginna. Therefore, the staff concludes that the impacts of renewing the Ginna OL will not be greater than impacts identified for these issues in the GEIS. The GEIS conclusion is that the impacts are of SMALL^(a) significance (except for collective offsite radiological impacts from the fuel cycle and from high-level waste and spent fuel, which were not assigned a single significance level).

The remaining issues that apply to Ginna are addressed in this SEIS. For each applicable issue, the staff concludes that the significance of the potential environmental impacts of renewal of the OL is SMALL. The staff also concludes that additional mitigation measures are not likely to be sufficiently beneficial as to be warranted. The staff determined that information provided during the scoping process did not identify any new issue that requires site specific assessment.

The NRC staff's recommendation is that the Commission determine that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for Ginna are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy-planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable. This recommendation is based on (1) the analysis and findings in the GEIS; (2) the Environmental Report submitted by RG&E; (3) consultation and discussions with Federal, state, and local agencies; (4) the staff's own independent review, and (5) the staff's consideration of public comments.

^(a) Environmental effects are not detectable or are so minor that they will neither destabilize nor noticeably alter any important attribute of the resource.